Upon first analyzing the source, the language used in the website appears to promote a strong message of environmentalism and sustainability. The website encourages individuals and organizations to act to protect the planet through sustainable energy practices, ending the use of plastic, and participating in global cleanup efforts. Also, the website may be perceived as biased toward promoting environmentalism and sustainability since it is important to note that the Earth Day movement has historically been focused on raising awareness and promoting action toward protecting the environment. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that the language used on the website would reflect these values.(Order for Homework Help Online)

Additionally, the second primary source article seems biased towards advocating for protecting the environment and addressing global warming. First, the article’s title, “Speaking for the Earth,” implies that the author is advocating for the environment. Also, throughout the article, the author frequently uses emotionally charged language to convey the urgency of the environmental crisis and the need for action to address it. For example, the author writes, “We are raping the earth,” and “We are rapidly approaching the point of no return.” In addition, the author presents evidence and arguments that support the idea that global warming is a real and pressing threat to the planet. For instance, the author cites scientific studies and reports documenting the rise in global temperatures and the resulting changes to the climate. The author also notes the negative impacts of global warming on various species and ecosystems, further emphasizing the urgency of addressing the issue. However, the article presents evidence and arguments to support its claims; it also has a clear bias toward advocating for protecting the environment and addressing global warming. Hire Professional Essay Writers online 

Source Comparison

The primary source, “Speaking for the Earth” by Ruben (1995), discusses the importance of speaking up for the Earth and its natural resources in the face of environmental degradation. The article emphasizes the need for action to address environmental issues, including pollution, deforestation, and the depletion of natural resources. Ruben also emphasizes the need for individuals and governments to take responsibility for protecting the environment and promoting sustainable practices. In contrast, the Earth Day 2023 website highlights specific actions that can be taken to promote sustainability and address environmental issues, such as investing in sustainable energy, reducing plastic use, and participating in global cleanup efforts. The website emphasizes the need for collective action to address environmental problems and provides resources and information to help individuals and organizations take action. Therefore, both sources address the importance of environmental protection and the need for action to address environmental issues. However, the primary source from 1995 emphasizes the need for speaking out and taking responsibility for environmental protection. In contrast, the 2023 Earth Day website provides specific actions and resources for individuals and organizations to take collective action toward a sustainable future.

Comparison the narratives

The primary source, “Speaking for the Earth” by Ruben (1995), highlights the importance of individual actions to protect the environment and stresses the need to shift societal values towards sustainability. The Earth Day 2023 website also emphasizes individual actions, such as investing in sustainable energy and reducing plastic use, intending to combat global warming.

The secondary sources by Dietz (2020) and Ulucak et al. (2019) both explore the evolution of environmentalism and sustainability. Dietz discusses how Earth Day has evolved from a focus on pollution to a broader focus on sustainability. Ulucak et al. trace the historical roots of sustainability concepts back to the early 20th century.

Narrative Description

The narrative has essentially impacted the contemporary comprehension of Earth Day and global warming is recognizing the urgent need for action to address climate change. The scientific consensus on the causes and consequences of global warming and the growing visibility of extreme weather events and other climate-related impacts has reinforced this narrative.

Historical Research Question

Revised research question: How has the environmental movement evolved, and how has it impacted global environmental policies?

The chosen narrative sources provide valuable insights into the history of the environmental movement and its impact on environmental policies. The primary source, “Earth Day 2023 ‘Invest In Our Planet,’ highlights the current focus areas of the environmental movement, such as sustainable energy, ending the use of plastics, and global cleanup. This information helps contextualize the environmental movement’s current state and goals.

The secondary sources also provide important context for understanding the historical evolution of the environmental movement. Dietz (2020) in his article states that traces the history of Earth Day and its impact on environmental policies over the past 50 years. This article helps to answer how the environmental movement has evolved over time and its impact on policies.

Similarly, the article by Ulucak et al. (2019) discusses the historical context of sustainability and how the concept has evolved. This source provides valuable context for understanding how the environmental movement has shifted its focus from conservation to sustainability and its impact on global environmental policies.

Research question: How has the evolution of Earth Day impacted public awareness and action toward addressing global warming?